← Back to work← Previous case study02 / 03 · Healthcare UXNext case study →
Healthcare UX · SiteRx · AI-assisted exploration

TrialMatch AI.

Cognitive support for clinical reviewers — a decision-support platform designed to reduce the cognitive load on clinical coordinators.

RoleSenior Product Designer (Contract)
CompanySiteRx
FocusClinical trial matching + patient recruitment
MethodsUser research · Complex systems · Prototyping
The challenge

Clinical work needed clearer review.

Clinical trial matching and patient recruitment involved complex workflows for physicians, healthcare teams and patients.

The design work translated clinical and operational requirements into user journeys, wireframes, prototypes and production-ready interfaces.

The design opportunity

Make the system easier to reason about — without hiding the complexity behind it.

01

Research

Use user research to understand the people and workflows around clinical review.

02

Structure

Translate clinical and operational requirements into clear journeys and interaction patterns.

03

Explore

Use rapid, AI-supported exploration to evaluate alternative flows and content structures.

04

Prototype

Move from workflow definition to wireframes, prototypes and production-ready interfaces.

My role

End-to-end product design for clinical trial matching.

01 / RESEARCH

User research

Translated clinical and operational requirements into user journeys and interaction problems to solve.

02 / SYSTEMS

Complex workflows

Worked across clinical trial matching and patient recruitment experiences with attention to healthcare context.

03 / PROTOTYPING

Rapid exploration

Created wireframes, prototypes and production-ready interfaces while evaluating alternative flows and content structures.

04 / COLLABORATION

Cross-functional design

Collaborated with US-based product, engineering and healthcare stakeholders while balancing user, business and regulatory considerations.

Outcome

Cognitive support, not cognitive replacement.

TrialMatch AI was positioned as decision support: helping clinical coordinators work through complex matching tasks while keeping the human review process central.

The work combined user research, complex-system thinking, prototyping and AI-supported exploration to make difficult clinical workflows easier to understand and act on.